Pro/ Con Research

I researched for both sides of this argument. First I found information all about why the athletes should not be paid. There is actually a ton of evidence for that side of the argument. It is very easy to defend the overall benefits education gives to a young adult. Then I researched the other side, we should pay the athletes. This side of the argument is basically all about the legal aspect of the argument. This argument ultimately boils down to the moral code of education vs. the the national labor laws. The two essays that follow are the two sides of the argument. I agree with both sides but I definitely lean more towards not paying the athletes. However my overall opinion is for a compromise. 




Tyler Steckbeck
Prof. Nyland
English 151 OM2
November 5, 2013
Athletes or Employees
            College sports is a billion dollar industry that benefits so many people in this country. Many people like to claim that it benefits everyone accept the athletes who provide the entertainment for the country. Those people push for the fact that those athletes are actually employees of the schools they play for and should be fairly compensated with a salary pay for all the work they put in on the field. That claim is absolutely ridiculous. Anyone who truly believes we should pay our student athletes undermines the principles of education and the value that attending a four year school gives to a young adult trying to make it in the “real world.” Sensible people know that college’s purpose is to educate young adults, schools already operate on a budget and asking them to pay athletes would be irrational, and federal law would never allow students to be paid. People who truly care about college sports, and all that it brings, understand the reasons why it is important to keep the system sacred and not allow, money hungry, corporate America to turn it into a cash cow where young adults can make money by playing a sport at a young age and lose sight of why they are actually at school.
            Colleges and universities are places where the primary focus is learning. The definition of a university is an institution of learning of the highest level, having a college of liberal arts and a program of graduate studies together with several professional schools, as of theology, law, medicine, and engineering, and authorized to confer both undergraduate and graduate degrees (Dictionary.com). Nowhere in that definition does it say a place where athletes can go strictly to get paid to play a sport for an institution. That is why they are called student athletes. Notice even in the name, student comes first. Now obviously schools benefit greatly from having winning teams and having star players. That is why schools recruit and try as hard as they can to bring in the best coaches and athletes. People argue the coaches get paid to win games, the university gets money for having winning teams, why shouldn’t the players get compensation? The answer to that is simple, they do. Scholarships are handed out every year to top notch athletes that pay for their entire education, the reason they went for further schooling. These athletes make a commitment to the school that they will do their best in their respected sport and in return they get a free education at a high class university. One can’t put a price on educational opportunity such as that. Ask any parent in the world and I am pretty certain they would trade anything for their child to attend one of the best schools in the nation for free and all they had to do was make a commitment to work as hard as they can at a sport they love. On top of earning a degree, these athletes get food, shelter, access to the best facilities they could imagine, and the experience of playing at a very high level. If they are serious about making it as a professional athlete, then what better place to prepare yourself then at an institution where you can be educated and play at a level that compares to the professional level. By paying student athletes we are completely going against everything a university is supposed to stand for.
            All universities operate on a budget and many of them do not have much wiggle room in those budgets, asking them to find money to pay their athletes would cause huge problems for many schools. Most universities have about twenty intercollegiate sports teams with each team having roughly fifteen to sixty players depending on the sport (The Klown Times). We don’t even need to do the math to be able to see that there is going to have to be a whole lot of money shifting to come up with the funds to pay all those athletes. Advocates for paying athletes then say well you only pay the sports who bring in the most revenue. So is the university going to prioritize its sports now? Who decides which sport is more important? The process is just plain illogical. The next question is who gets paid and how do you decided how much they get paid? Will the starting quarter back, or the Heisman Award candidate get the same pay as the fifth-string linebacker (The Klown Times)? To ask a school to answer all these questions and so many more is ridiculous. Why not take that money you would spend to pay one student and spend it on the entire sports program, which is what most schools currently do. All the money made from a winning team is put towards making that teams surrounding better so they can continue winning. Paying individuals takes away from the team aspect and the all for one and one for all attitude that is supposed to be learned through sports.
            There are already current federal and common laws that prevent the paying of student athletes. The NCAA (National Collegiate Athletic Association) has been under fire for this topic many times and every time they prove that student-athletes are not employees in accordance with the court. There is a common law economic reality test that uses four factors to determine whether an employment relationship exists. The four factors are:
1. Employer’s right to control or dictate the activities of the proposed employee.
2. Employer’s right to discipline or fire the proposed employee.
3. Payment of wages and specifically the extent to which the proposed employee is dependent upon the payment of wages or other benefits for living expenses.
4. Whether the task performed by the proposed employee was an integral part of the proposed employer’s business (Belzer).
Now one may read these factors and see that there are similarities between student athletes and employees. However, they do not quite meet all the requirements. The first two factors are pretty easily met. The coach has much control over his players with mandatory practice times, meetings, study halls, etc. (Belzer). But contrary to popular belief, the coach cannot tell his player they cannot take a certain class or major. They just have to simply work together to find other ways of accomplishing that goal. Also, coaches have the right to discipline their players and if needed take away their scholarships due to infractions by a player (Belzer). The third factor is where things get interesting. What a player receives from a scholarship is the necessary resources they need in order to fulfill their education at that particular university. These benefits are not considered taxable compensations although some things received can be translated into money value (Belzer). Of course others who are advocates for the paying of athletes can interpret these factors differently but, so far no courts have been able to agree with their interpretations. There are of course many comparisons to the sport an athlete plays being their job. The athlete was brought to the school to perform and in exchange they receive free schooling which many families know is a huge deal. If the athlete doesn’t fulfill the agreements they can still attend the university, they just will have to pay like any other normal student. If the athlete feels that compensation is not enough they can opt to go professional and try to achieve what they believe they deserve.
            In conclusion if student athletes were to be paid it would make an absolute mockery of the college athletics program and ruin everything that has been achieved through the system so far. More wealthy schools would become powerhouses since they would be able to offer their athletes a higher salary. Thus in turn destroying any chance of fair playing fields and ruining the excitement of collegiate sports. The change in rules would cause so many problems for universities that some may even eventually just crumble. The amount of under the table and back alley deals that would go on would tarnish the ever so prestigious reputation that has been earned by the NCAA throughout its over a century of existence.

                                                             Works Cited
Belzer, Jason. "Leveling the Playing Field: Student Athletes or Employee Athletes?" Forbes.
Forbes Magazine, 09 Sept. 2013. Web. 06 Nov. 2013.
Cooper, Kenneth J. "Should College Athletes Be Paid To Play?." Diverse: Issues In Higher
            Education 28.10 (2011): 12. Master FILE Premier. Web. 6 Nov. 2013.
Dictionary.com. Dictionary.com, n.d. Web. 06 Nov. 2013.
"The Klown Times." The Klown Times. N.p., n.d. Web. 06 Nov. 2013.



Tyler Steckbeck
Prof. Nyland
English 151 OM2
November 5, 2013
Employees or Athletes
            A typical day in the life of a division one college athlete starts of like this wake up hours before class, get a lift or conditioning session in, go to class until about four in the afternoon, go to practice, go to study hall, finish homework or study for test, and then on top of that enjoy and take in the college experience (Harnett). On top of a full schedule athletes have the added pressure of being expected to perform at the highest level every week in front of, in some cases, millions of people. This seems like a lot and you tend to wonder, what do these athletes get in return for all of this work? The answer is nothing. Many former and current college athletes who all went through this same unjust system agree that college athletes should be paid since playing a division one sport is practically like having a full time job, everyone else in the system seems to get their cut of the revenue, and there are different solutions to change the current rules. These athletes put their entire life in to their sport of choice and it is time to finally reward them for all the hard work, blood, sweat, and tears they shed while playing.
            Playing a division one sport is very comparable to holding down a full time job accept being a division one athlete you get no benefits for all the work you put in. People who do not support the paying of college athletes argue that their benefit is the scholarship they receive to go to school. Well much like how an employee can be fired at any time, an athlete’s scholarship can be revoked at any time no matter what their GPA is at the time (Rose). So an athlete must perform at all times in order to keep their scholarship which constantly keeps a huge amount of pressure on an athlete. The fact that despite an athlete’s grades they can still lose the only way they are going to school at a university just proves that the primary reason these students are at the university is to win games. If they win games, they can stay. If they fail to perform, they are out. What is that teaching young adults about priorities? Also two law professors from Michigan State University have found that according to the four tests of Common Law college athletes can be classified as employees of the NCAA (Cooper). The four tests are:
1. Employer’s right to control or dictate the activities of the proposed employee.
2. Employer’s right to discipline or fire the proposed employee.
3. Payment of wages and specifically the extent to which the proposed employee is dependent upon the payment of wages or other benefits for living expenses.
4. Whether the task performed by the proposed employee was an integral part of the proposed employer’s business (Belzer).
They pass the first test due to the fact of the schedules the coaches can put the athletes on and the amount of control the university has over the scholarships the athletes receives. The second test is passed since, as previously stated, the university and the NCAA has the ability to revoke an athlete’s scholarship at any time. The third test is met since the athletes depend completely on the scholarship they receive for food, shelter, their education, and for the little extra money they receive. The fourth test is passed since college athletics has transformed into a billion dollar industry. With all the revenue from events, video game deals, television deals, the NCAA is not the same as it used to be. None of this would be possible without the dedication of the athletes. If we are looking at these test by the facts, it is certain that college athletes can be classified as employees and should receive proper payment for the work they put in day in and day out.
            College athletics is a billion dollar industry that has quickly become a huge place of revenue for Universities, coaches, and the NCAA. Everyone seems to be cashing in on this enormous business accept for the ones providing the show, the athletes. When an athletic program is winning and getting major spotlight time through their sports the university makes a large profit. All of the revenue generated by the events the athletes play at goes to their university. Since the better your team the more money you receive universities recruit based on what athletes they think can boost their program, or revenue, not their GPA or abilities in the class room. This forces the coaches to recruit the same way since if their team is winning games their salary is larger. The average salary for a division one college football coach in 2012 was $1.64 million ("NCAA Football Coaches' Average Salary at $1.64 Million."). The average salary for a division one college basketball coach whose team made the NCAA tournament was $1.4 million ("The Economics of College Basketball: Do Coaches Earn Their Pay? - VU Hoops."). Plus is a coach makes the playoffs, wins a championship or has any big accomplishments they receive a bonus. So the players, the employees, are showing up every day and putting work in with no pay while their coach, who is supposed to be their leader and friend, is making millions barking out orders and having complete control of the future of these athletes. The NCAA is also cashing out on the business that these athletes create. Along with the video game deals with EA Sports that the NCAA has, they have also signed a television deal with CBS worth $10.8 billion over 14 years (Harnett). On top of these deals the NCAA receives huge revenue from tournaments and different games such as March Madness. While everyone else is swimming in the money the athletes are left with a packed schedule and struggle to pay for a dinner out. Tell me what’s fair about that?
            There are solutions that have been proposed to change the NCAA rules slightly to allow players to at least be somewhat compensated. The rules now basically force the athletes to not be able to have any money at all. It is nearly impossible for athletes to pick up a part time job with all of their prior commitments to their sport. Even if they do get a job there is a limit from the NCAA on how much the athlete can make at that part time job. So if you won’t allow the athlete to make money on their own it only make since to give them some return pay for their full time job of being the best they can possibly be at their sport. One big proposal for this idea is the idea of a stipend that would allow the athlete to receive about $2,000 per semester just for spending money (Rose). This would also insure the athletes are stay for whole semesters. Many former big time college athletes support this idea as well. Former guard at the University of Michigan, Jalen Rose, states, “providing a $2,000 per semester stipend to student athletes will at least offer these kids a drop in the bucket to cover living expenses…” Coming from a former player who knows a lot about being a big time college athlete that means a lot. He lived the life that these athletes currently go through and knows their pain. If anyone knows how much athletes should be repaid it would be Mr. Rose.
            To sum it all up, college athletes who perform at the highest of levels should be paid simply because it is the right thing to do. For all of the work that these young adults put in to their sport, or profession as some may look at it, they deserve to receive some kind of payment. These athletes give up their entire lives for their university and their sport, it is time that their university gave them what they deserve. The unjust free business these athletes provide to so many has been going on too long. It is time to do the right thing and give these hard working students their cut of the money the NCAA and universities have been hogging.

Works Cited
Belzer, Jason. "Leveling the Playing Field: Student Athletes or Employee Athletes?" Forbes.
Forbes Magazine, 09 Sept. 2013. Web. 06 Nov. 2013.
Cooper, Kenneth J. "Should College Athletes Be Paid To Play?." Diverse: Issues In Higher
            Education 28.10 (2011): 12-13. ERIC. Web. 11 Nov. 2013.
Hartnett, Tyson. "Why College Athletes Should Be Paid." The Huffington Post.
            TheHuffingtonPost.com, 21 Oct. 2013. Web. 11 Nov. 2013.
"NCAA Football Coaches' Average Salary at $1.64 Million." USA Today. Gannett, n.d. Web. 11
Nov. 2013.
Rose, Jalen. "Should College Athletes Be Paid?." Jet 119.11 (2011): 48. MAS Ultra - School
            Edition. Web. 11 Nov. 2013.
"The Economics of College Basketball: Do Coaches Earn Their Pay? - VU Hoops." VU Hoops.
            N.p., n.d. Web. 11 Nov. 2013.

No comments:

Post a Comment